Semiotics Semiotics for these two videos are very various. Let's talk about the documentary. The backgroudn music of this video is very grand, loud, bass focused, and heavy. This means that the video is not taking any easy topics. Even though the history of the airport isn't really serious, the music made us to think that the video is noth the thing that we could watch without think. The tempo of the music also made the watchers to be tense and pay more attention. Therefore, I think the semiotic of the background music in the documentary was very powerful, and it affected the audience's mood well.
Then, let's talk about the mockumentary. For the mockumentary's background music, it didn't made watchers to be very tense compared to the documentary's. The sound was actually funny. So, I could watch it without thinking so deeply. It was quite fun videos. The tempo was pretty slow. I think since the mockumentary was made to be give audiences fun, the music makers did their job well.
Globalization
The globalization for the both videos are vivid. Because the videos were about airports, it gave us the message that airport is really important part of globalized society. If you carefully watch the documentary, the system of airport aren't from just one airport. Each of system is from lots of airports even from other countries. And if there was no globalized passengers who planned to go abroad, there wouldn't be a signal system(systems that makes airplanes not crash into eachothers) for the air crafts.
For the mockumentary, I can only think about the woman from somewhere in Africa. The officer doesn't know where the country is she's telling. However, this was the fun point. He was acting really funny, and I think the passenger, the African, was the only actually woman in that video. Anyways, if a person from Africa is in London, that means people from any part of world is in London in that airport. Isn't this also a globalization?
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기